hart2hart

Any possibility that recent Polyglot upgrade could have contributed to this?

I'm getting odd results but when trying to debug I realized the fields like last message, access code, and last time are not flowing into the general eISY logging system. The following programs trigger based on the last way the deadbolt was unlocked without the code from above that does a Force Update even running. I could see that last message is "Locked by Schlage Button" so I'm lost. Garage:Deadbolt Unlocked By Apple Key - [ID 01F6][Parent 0124] If $Security_Allow_Schlage_To_Disarm_I is 1 And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message is Unlocked by Apple key And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time is not '$Security_Armed_Garage_Deadbolt_Last_Message_Time_I Unix Timestamp' And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time > 0.0 Unix Timestamp Then Set 'Security System / Security System:Partition' Disarm Send Notification to 'JPaulText' content 'Security Disarmed Via Schlage Message' Else - No Actions - (To add one, press 'Action') Garage:Deadbolt Unlocked By Paul - [ID 0125][Parent 0124] If $Security_Allow_Schlage_To_Disarm_I is 1 And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message is Unlocked by keypad And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Access Code Used is '$Security_Code_Paul_I User Number' And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time is not '$Security_Armed_Garage_Deadbolt_Last_Message_Time_I Unix Timestamp' And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time > 0.0 Unix Timestamp Then Set 'Security System / Security System:Partition' Disarm Send Notification to 'JPaulText' content 'Security Disarmed Via Schlage Message' Else - No Actions - (To add one, press 'Action')

What is expectation for the data to update after the Force Update command is issued?

Still researching and testing. There are three messages in last message list without a description. They are: o Unknown o Unknown (both unknowns show at the top of the drop-down list) o 31 Also, there is a message type called "History Cleared" in the drop-down list. Does that imply the node server could have a command that would clear all history. If so, I could run that command when security is armed to make it simpler as I suggested in option 2 of original post.

...a bit more, the fields for the deadbolt from node server appear to only support Status and not Control so this means if field happens to have same value as last time, it will not trigger -- correct? If that is the case, should I put in an additional If like IF the epoch date is > 0 to ensure it always triggers program when it changes? Can the field be defined so it triggers with Control or Status? It feels like the IF section for comparing Old stored and current event epoch times may always force a trigger as the new date changed.

What version does Finder or AC report you are running? 6,0.3? 6.0.0? When you go to Polyglot, does it report and update to 3.4.5?

@Goose66 , this node server is great. I've been using open action of Schlage lock to disarm my security system for a few months and with Force Update, its great! There is a "flaw" in my programming that I recognized with my scheme, so I always make sure the last message is locked by handle on the door. Without describing it completely, with scheme I'm using if last message was a disarm with code. and I forgot to actually lock the door then just opening the door would result in a security disarm. Now that Apple Key is working, I want to expand auto disarm to four other locks but not with the flaw that requires me to confirm contents of last message each time security is armed at all locks Methods I've considered: 1) Get last message time and confirm it was in the last say 10-15 seconds. Issue is I can't locate how to manipulate current time into epoch time with eISY program (also couldn't find a node server that does it) to do the math. On one of Jimbo Automates node servers, he added seconds since last update element so someone could monitor the device had not changed. Would that we possible with this node server? It feels this would be the best option. to control and feel good about not hosing security. EDIT - I just located how to set variable to current epoch time so evaluating how that might help. 2) Another possibility would be if there was a way for me to request node server to clear the last message and user code fields at the time security is armed. Flaw here would appear to be would the fields get set again at time I did Force Update. 3) Finally, at the time the security system is armed, store and persist the current value of Last Update epoch time in a variable and then when using mostly my current scheme add to the If to say current last update time is not same as the value stored in the variables. Easy enough it appears, does it sound reasonable to prevent what I described as the flaw. What do you think? Example programs using this method: Security:Store Last Update Times for Locks at Armed If $Security_Armed is 1 Then $Security_Armed_Garage_Deadbolt_Last_Message_Time_I = 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time Unix Timestamp $Security_Armed_Garage_Deadbolt_Last_Message_Time_I Init To 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time Unix Timestamp Garage:Deadbolt Entry Delay Disarm With Schlage Code 'Security System / Security System:Partition' Partition State is Entry Delay And 'Security System / Zone:Garage Door' Zone State is Open Then Wait 1 second Set 'Garage / Garage Door' Force Update Action of Short poll (10 seconds) or the Force Update from above triggers following programs Garage:Deadbolt Unlocked By Paul If 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Access Code Used is '$Security_Code_Paul_I User Number' And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time is not '$Security_Armed_Garage_Deadbolt_Last_Message_Time_I Unix Timestamp' Then Set 'Security System / Security System:Partition' Disarm (it uses the user code to disarm but that doesn't show in the program copy to clipboard) Garage:Deadbolt Unlocked By Wife If 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Access Code Used is '$Security_Code_Wife_I User Number' And 'Garage / Garage Door' Last Message Time is not '$Security_Armed_Garage_Deadbolt_Last_Message_Time_I Unix Timestamp' Then Set 'Security System / Security System:Partition' Disarm (it uses the user code to disarm but that doesn't show in the program copy to clipboard)

@Goose66 , I contacted Schlage support and received updated instructions compared to when I first purchased the locks. The locks now work all three ways: 1. Schlage App 2. HomeKit app 3. Nodeserver The new instructions is to add to Schlage App first and then in the Schlage App to take option "Works With Home?" to add them to the Apple Home app. I can now unlock with just touch of iPhone and Apple Watch.

Click Start Linking and then Press and hold set button till it dings always works best for me for adding devices. Is that method you used or did you key in the insteon id?

Try the login credentials you used before 6.0.0 was installed.

What version of FW is the eISY running. It changed with version 6.0.0 and started using the UD portal credentials.

I'm using only Wifi as far as I know and want to have control in eISY eco system like now and to be able to use Home Keys from Apple Watch and iPhone.

@Goose66 and others. I'd like to use my locks so that I can unlock with Apple Watch after a run. When I first got the I could only use one of these methods at a time. The nodeserver is great and so I can now do things from Schlage App and eISY NS. I want to add Apple home for watch and iPhone access. I located the following Schlage Encode Plus in Apple Home (w/ HomeKey) and Home Assistant - Hardware - Home Assistant Community Does anyone have experience with this config to support all three? The article mentions Home Assistant but it feels like the NS does the same. Alos, I see mention that using locks via Thread makes battery life 2x to 3x longer. Is it possible to leverage it with the NS or some other decent path like through HA?

That’s method I always use to add.

If moving only Insteon devices, it works well. Zwave adds to complexity. You want to upgrade as the knowledge around isy994 migration is fading.

How long has it been updating?

Thanks @bmercier ! That’s good news! Paul

Partition State has entry and exit delay. I use both.

@bmercier is this possible? Thanks for great plugin. Paul

Reboot eISY. There is a known issue where newly added devices show up with ghost nodes until a reboot.

…adding a bit more. Since node server can see need to Authenticate, could that be added as a node or field to detect it in eISY program?

Thanks, @bmercier . I can only recall needing to authenticate at install and couple weeks ago. Do you know what triggers a need to authenticate? I'm considering replacing my ring doorbell wit the new Pro 3 4K version. The issue is the new pro 3 does not have a way to ring you in house chimes. I use this capability in older doorbell to close a relay that signal to my Russound whole house audio system that plays the chime overall a set of speakers per floor. I've created the following programs that will detect the ding and close the rea in an IOLinc. Before I use it (in all the cloud glory) to signal doorbell, I wanted to ensure that Ring (device or service) is not prone to going offline and hence I would miss the doorbell ring. Ring should create a kit like the mini chime that receives the signal wireless but not cloud that will see the ring and close a relay. What do you think? Is there no way to detect Ring is not working for whatever reason? What does the Test function do? Sorry for all the questions as I can't locate more documenations. Thanks, Paul Front Porch:Doorbell Rang - [ID 017A][Parent 00E3] If 'Front Porch / Front Porch:Ring Doorbell' is switched Ding Then Set 'Attic / Attic:Doorbell Trigger' On Ring:Ring Front Porch Doorbell Status - [ID 0153][Parent 01F5] If 'Front Porch / Front Porch:Ring Doorbell' Status is not Online Then Send Notification to 'JPaulText' content 'Ring Node Is Offline'

@bmercier I had to authenticate recently and made a note to see if I can catch that condition via program. I already test the node server status for being offline. Is being offline also potentially an indication authenticate required? I don't think it does as I didn't get a notification in recent case. To that end, I wrote following 3 programs. Would they catch it at least within an hour? Also, is best practice to test each ring device for offline in addition to the node server (read other posts where they are not necessarily the same-- none of my Ring devices are battery powered) Ring:Ring Test Results_Run At Startup - [ID 014F][Parent 01F5][Run At Startup] If - No Conditions - (To add one, press 'Schedule' or 'Condition') Then Run Program 'Ring:Ring Test Poll Results' (Then Path) Else - No Actions - (To add one, press 'Action') Ring:Ring Test Poll Results - [ID 0150][Parent 01F5] If Time is Last Run Time for 'Ring:Ring Test Poll Results' + 1 hour Then Set 'Ring / Ring' Test Ring Else - No Actions - (To add one, press 'Action') Ring:Ring Test Poll Results Evaluation - [ID 0152][Parent 01F5] If 'Ring / Ring' Test result is Ring Auth. Failure Or 'Ring / Ring' Test result is Timeout Or 'Ring / Ring' Test result is Failure Then Send Notification to 'JPaulText' content 'Ring NodeServer Failure' Else - No Actions - (To add one, press 'Action')

Are the LED lights listed as dimmable?

i saw issue with mixture of Insteon and other plugin devices. All corrected by reboots after the device was added.