andrewm Posted March 30, 2008 Share Posted March 30, 2008 Using a non-standard telnet port (126) does virtually nothing to improve security, instead all it does is serve to drive us mad when we can't telnet in until we remember / lookup the port the ISY uses. So why bother doing it? At least give us the option to change it back to the RFC-compliant port 23 if we want! Link to comment
Michel Kohanim Posted March 31, 2008 Share Posted March 31, 2008 andrewm, This is planned for our next release. With kind regards, Michel Using a non-standard telnet port (126) does virtually nothing to improve security, instead all it does is serve to drive us mad when we can't telnet in until we remember / lookup the port the ISY uses. So why bother doing it? At least give us the option to change it back to the RFC-compliant port 23 if we want! Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.