Jump to content

zwave fireplace switch?


Recommended Posts

Posted

So, I've got a new house that was built ~1yr ago, and I have a couple fireplaces that are controller either by a wall switch, or a remote.  I'd like to know if I can replace this wall switch with a cooper aspire zwave switch to control this.  Has anybody done this before?  It seems like it's a regular switch, but I haven't fully pulled it out of the wall just yet.

 

https://goo.gl/photos/capL28soqDBAYhQF8

 

Thanks!

Posted

So, I've got a new house that was built ~1yr ago, and I have a couple fireplaces that are controller either by a wall switch, or a remote.  I'd like to know if I can replace this wall switch with a cooper aspire zwave switch to control this.  Has anybody done this before?  It seems like it's a regular switch, but I haven't fully pulled it out of the wall just yet.

 

https://goo.gl/photos/capL28soqDBAYhQF8

 

Thanks!

 

 

Most fireplace switches are only a way to complete the circuit loop. If you were to take off the switch I am sure you will only see a two-wire phone cable. There is usually no power run to the box. You best bet is an IOLInk plugged under the fireplace and when the switch is on it turns on and visa versa or controlled via a remote. I have mine with a safety  where if the switch is up/on then the IOLink will turn on via a remote, if switch is down/off then the IOLink won't turn on. I think if you search the forums there are topics on this already. Hope this helps.

Posted

Most fireplace switches are only a way to complete the circuit loop. If you were to take off the switch I am sure you will only see a two-wire phone cable. There is usually no power run to the box. You best bet is an IOLInk plugged under the fireplace and when the switch is on it turns on and visa versa or controlled via a remote. I have mine with a safety  where if the switch is up/on then the IOLink will turn on via a remote, if switch is down/off then the IOLink won't turn on. I think if you search the forums there are topics on this already. Hope this helps.

 

Thanks Scott!  It looks like you're correct:

 

https://goo.gl/photos/NrGzE8F7RVZ72SsK6

 

I tried searching on this, but apparently I suck at it :/

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Seems a little risky to have home automation control a fire. I wouldn't do it.

I've had mine on Insteon for over three years. I have a program set up to make sure it doesn't run for more than 15 minutes.

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Posted

Our fireplace has been Insteon controlled since the inception of Insteon. It's a fireplace, not a fire!

Posted

I could say I've played Russian roulette 3 times and I didn't shoot myself, so it must be OK.  

 

This forum is replete with HA events that are unexpected and/or unexplained.  That might be fine with a light bulb, but not a fire.  Fire's (in fireplaces) must be attended to at all times and HA opens the distinct possibility that a fire could turn on when on not attended to.  I honestly don't understand why you would even want a fireplace on HA since the only reason to have a fire is to look at it and if you are there to look at it, why not use the UL approved device for turning it on and off since you are right there. 

 

You might also consider talking with your insurance company and local code.  I would venture to guess that this is not allowed by code and that your insurance company might deny a claim should one occur.  

Posted

My fireplace supplies heat for the house. I think I know better about my system than you do.

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Posted

Both our fireplaces are primarily for heat and they look great, too. Low cost fireplace installations usually include a wall switch, but more upscale fireplaces include a remote and/or thermostat, many controllable using a smartphone. Fire codes have not indicated that such control is unsafe.

 

Older wood-burning fireplaces with exposed fires are not remote controllable.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...