Jump to content

Web Interface Status


DrLumen

Recommended Posts

I have an odd one, at least I think it is odd. When I use the web interface, almost all the devices show as on but with 0%. They never actually go to an off status.  Does everyone see this for ZWave stuff?

Yes, I have this with my dimmer and fan switches.  0 % is like OFF.

Link to comment

IMO, anything less than 2 or 3% should be shown as off. The issue is when scanning over everything as it scrolls past shows almost every thing as on. But, then I have to check the percentages of them to confirm. Some even show as On and Off - however that is supposed to work.

 

It's getting hard to stay positive about some of this shtuff.

Link to comment

IMO, anything less than 2 or 3% should be shown as off. The issue is when scanning over everything as it scrolls past shows almost every thing as on. But, then I have to check the percentages of them to confirm. Some even show as On and Off - however that is supposed to work.

 

It's getting hard to stay positive about some of this shtuff.

 

IMO, anything greater than 0% should show as on. In fact, anything greater than 0% is not subject to an opinion at all wrt/on or off.

 

Interesting fact: Around the time of Socrates, zero (0) did not exist or at least it was debated. The logic was, how can you show/prove the existence of nothing B)

Link to comment

IMO, anything greater than 0% should show as on. In fact, anything greater than 0% is not subject to an opinion at all wrt/on or off.

 

Interesting fact: Around the time of Socrates, zero (0) did not exist or at least it was debated. The logic was, how can you show/prove the existence of nothing B)

Eureka !!!!!!!    :-P

Link to comment

IMO, anything greater than 0% should show as on. In fact, anything greater than 0% is not subject to an opinion at all wrt/on or off.

 

Interesting fact: Around the time of Socrates, zero (0) did not exist or at least it was debated. The logic was, how can you show/prove the existence of nothing B)

I would think it would have been really easy for them.

 

"How many any sheep are in that field?"

After a quick look, "None!"

 

larryllix, if your LED's glow at 1%, are they giving off any 'real' luminance? If so, you have an instrumentation error. :)

 

Anyway, I say 2-3% from past experience. YMMV.

Link to comment

I would think it would have been really easy for them.

 

"How many any sheep are in that field?"

After a quick look, "None!"

 

larryllix, if your LED's glow at 1%, are they giving off any 'real' luminance? If so, you have an instrumentation error. :)

 

Anyway, I say 2-3% from past experience. YMMV.

"How many any sheep are in that field?"

After a quick look, "None!"

 

That is why I am sometimes sleepless...... I keep counting and founding none.

Link to comment

I would think it would have been really easy for them.

 

"How many any sheep are in that field?"

After a quick look, "None!"

 

Of course they recognized when there was none (to be counted). The concern was about mathematical proof. Mathematics was in it's infancy and everything needed a reproducible proof. Even in arithmetic, zero did not exist. Neither adding nor subtracting zero made no difference and, at the time. multiplying or dividing by zero made no sense. It just wasn't done.

 

Even in modern mathematics, we differentiate between nothing and zero. For example, there is nothing between these brackets [   ]. That's not the case here [ 1, 2 ] nor here [ 0, 1 ] nor even here [0, 0]. Each set contains two elements.

 

More trivia: LISP introduced beginning with 0 instead of the traditional 1 in programming.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...