Michel Kohanim Posted June 24, 2008 Posted June 24, 2008 Hi siegeld, We used to have a UPB beta but we didn't have enough support/demand and thus abandoned it for now. You should expect ZWave first ... we are working very hard on getting the hardware just right. With kind regards, Michel Wondering which one I could expect first, as well.
jseriff Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 Is there still a plan for this device to be released in Q3 of this year? Will it include a Java SDK for development? Thanks, Jason
Michel Kohanim Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 Hi Jason, It's more likely that it would be in the end of Q4 and yes it would have a JSDK and WSDK. With kind regards, Michel Is there still a plan for this device to be released in Q3 of this year? Will it include a Java SDK for development? Thanks, Jason
Guest Posted August 23, 2008 Posted August 23, 2008 Can you advise if the UPB version will be available in the next 6 months? And can we just replace the PLM and reflash the firmware if we have an ISY-26? I hate to lose the ISY but SH is not standing behind the products (again) and Insteon is s a money pit. Thanks
Michel Kohanim Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Hi Digger, I can say that the ZWave version would be available within the next 6 months. The UPB version depends on other factors. Unfortunately you cannot do it on a 26. We are still working out the details simply because there will be a mismatch between the filesystems. With kind regards, Michel Can you advise if the UPB version will be available in the next 6 months? And can we just replace the PLM and reflash the firmware if we have an ISY-26? I hate to lose the ISY but SH is not standing behind the products (again) and Insteon is s a money pit. Thanks
Guest Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Hi Digger, I can say that the ZWave version would be available within the next 6 months. The UPB version depends on other factors. Unfortunately you cannot do it on a 26. We are still working out the details simply because there will be a mismatch between the filesystems. With kind regards, Michel Can you advise if the UPB version will be available in the next 6 months? And can we just replace the PLM and reflash the firmware if we have an ISY-26? I hate to lose the ISY but SH is not standing behind the products (again) and Insteon is s a money pit. Thanks Ok then if I convert I will ebay the ISY. There are a few options out there for UPB I just really liked the ISY. I am waiting on a few quotes for the UPB devices and if I get a good enough price for a bulk purchase I will rip out the Insteon shortly as I have a few things not working because of dead devices. I had lamost 8 or so in the past month and it is just to expensive to replace them so often. SH is back to no honoring the warranty again so thats that. I will remember to send you the switch I owe you. Zwave is more expensive (for me as I dont have a direct account with them) and the WAF for the look of the switches is low. Thanks for everything.
upstatemike Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Aren't there other issues with Z-Wave? I've heard: Links are directed device to device communications that make it hard to use a central controller to monitor changes Devices depend on a routing tables built from signal strength readings so making changes (even moving a plug-in module) becomes a complicated process Total devices in a single network is limited to 64 or 128 (I forget which) All brands share common functionality but extended features are specific to the manufacturer. Since each Z-Wave network needs a master controller, wouldn't you be stuck with only using advanced features from devices that are the same brand as the master controller? Don't Elk panels and other third party devices have some unresolved issues in communicating with Z-Wave networks? If I was going to migrate away from Insteon, I'm not convinced that Z-Wave would be the best answer!
Michel Kohanim Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Digger, I totally understand and hopefully we'll have our UPB version by the time you get your UPB system setup. upstatemike, Thanks so very much for the feedback. Please see my comments below. With kind regards, Michel Aren't there other issues with Z-Wave? I've heard: Links are directed device to device communications that make it hard to use a central controller to monitor changes Devices depend on a routing tables built from signal strength readings so making changes (even moving a plug-in module) becomes a complicated process Yes but we are working on some novel solutions that might alleviate these shortcomings just a little. Total devices in a single network is limited to 64 or 128 (I forget which) Total number of devices is 232 All brands share common functionality but extended features are specific to the manufacturer. Since each Z-Wave network needs a master controller, wouldn't you be stuck with only using advanced features from devices that are the same brand as the master controller? Yes, but it does not mean that there cannot be a controller that knows all the extended functionalities of most devices out there Don't Elk panels and other third party devices have some unresolved issues in communicating with Z-Wave networks? If I was going to migrate away from Insteon, I'm not convinced that Z-Wave would be the best answer!
jseriff Posted October 28, 2008 Posted October 28, 2008 Michel, Is this product (z-wave) still on track for this year? Is there an estimated date when these might be available? Thanks, Jason
Michel Kohanim Posted October 29, 2008 Posted October 29, 2008 Hi Jason, Without any guarantees, the answer is yes (for alpha). With kind regards, Michel Michel, Is this product (z-wave) still on track for this year? Is there an estimated date when these might be available? Thanks, Jason
C Martin Posted October 29, 2008 Posted October 29, 2008 Michel, It is my guess that the Z-Wave product will be a separate ISY-99 device? Is it possible for the one ISY device to have multiple protocols?
C Martin Posted October 29, 2008 Posted October 29, 2008 I know that I am asking a lot.... you see I still need to upgrade from my ISY-26 to the 99 and this adds more justification....joking! We all need to justify all of our toys.
Michel Kohanim Posted October 29, 2008 Posted October 29, 2008 Hello C Martin, LOL. Yes but only with the addition of the serial expander which we are working on. With kind regards, Michel Michel,It is my guess that the Z-Wave product will be a separate ISY-99 device? Is it possible for the one ISY device to have multiple protocols?
C Martin Posted October 30, 2008 Posted October 30, 2008 Cool! I am looking forward to the additions, and I will certainly upgrade to the ISY-99i
jseriff Posted January 9, 2009 Posted January 9, 2009 I havent heard anything on the Z-Wave adapter in a few months, is there a new ETA on when this product might be available?
Michel Kohanim Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 Hi jserriff, Yes, we are very close. We should have something very soon. I wished I could give you an ETA but, due to the recent INSTEON i2 issues, all my ETAs have turned out to be wrong. With kind regards, Michel I havent heard anything on the Z-Wave adapter in a few months, is there a new ETA on when this product might be available?
jseriff Posted February 18, 2009 Posted February 18, 2009 Just doing my monthly check-in on the z-wave interface. Is this still planned? I have a project I would like to interface with z-wave, and your Java API makes that much easier for me than some of your competitors, but if this product is still far off, writing a Java wrapper library would be much quicker for me.
Michel Kohanim Posted February 19, 2009 Posted February 19, 2009 Hello jseriff, ZWave: very close but not there yet. All the i2 stuff set us back at least a month. With kind regards, Michel Just doing my monthly check-in on the z-wave interface. Is this still planned? I have a project I would like to interface with z-wave, and your Java API makes that much easier for me than some of your competitors, but if this product is still far off, writing a Java wrapper library would be much quicker for me.
B0SST0N Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 So has the ISY-99z been canned? Been waiting for this for a looooong time. I loved my 99i for insteon. It was the only part of the insteon system I liked... which is was why I went zwave. I have to say, zwave has had much more reliable communication for me. I am just missing the nice controller now.
Michel Kohanim Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 Hello BOSSTON, UPB is now way at the bottom of our list. ZWave is one of the highest priority activities. If you haven't done so yet, please submit a ticket (http://www.universal-devices.com/contact.htm) with subject ISY-99z Beta and you'll be one of the first ones to have your hands on it. With kind regards, Michel So has the ISY-99z been canned? Been waiting for this for a looooong time. I loved my 99i for insteon. It was the only part of the insteon system I liked... which is was why I went zwave. I have to say, zwave has had much more reliable communication for me. I am just missing the nice controller now.
upstatemike Posted September 8, 2009 Posted September 8, 2009 How will things work in a mixed Insteon/Z-Wave environment? Do you use an ISY for each technology? Can they talk to each other and have devices of each type within a single scene? Will there be an ISY version that handles both technologies from one controller?
Michel Kohanim Posted September 9, 2009 Posted September 9, 2009 Hi upstatemike, We are working on this solution as we speak. I cannot give you more details simply because we are still designing it. With kind regards, Michel
B0SST0N Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Just checking in on the 99z... again... any news? At one point I thought it was really close to rolling out to beta status?
Brian H Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 One point on a mixed ZWave and Insteon system. I bought some Intermatic Home Settings ZWave modules. When they where being phased out and dirt cheap. Since they don't use power line signals. They have a very large capacitor across the AC line for noise. This capacitor absorbes X10 and Insteon signals big time.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.