Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Teken,

 

I think we are talking passed each other. Let me try again:

1. The problem is the Admin Console/Java using SSLv2. This has NOTHING to do with your browser and its configuration

2. The link I sent in my email (http://www.universal-devices.com/99i/3.3.2/admin.jnlp) is the one that you said you had no problem using. Is this still the case? If so, I am not sure I understand why you keep using the link from TouchSwitch (which may be pointing to a different UI)

 

With kind regards,

Michel

Posted
Hi Teken,

 

I think we are talking passed each other. Let me try again:

1. The problem is the Admin Console/Java using SSLv2. This has NOTHING to do with your browser and its configuration

2. The link I sent in my email (http://www.universal-devices.com/99i/3.3.2/admin.jnlp) is the one that you said you had no problem using. Is this still the case? If so, I am not sure I understand why you keep using the link from TouchSwitch (which may be pointing to a different UI)

 

With kind regards,

Michel

 

Perhaps we are not on the same page. I had no problem using the link you provided on the LAN, but how does that help me accessing the Admin Console remotely using HTTPS ?

 

If the Touchswitch is pointing to a different UI how is this corrected?

 

Teken . . .

Posted

I installed 3.3.2 on 9/20 and over the next few days I noticed my irrigation is running less frequently. I found that the evapotranspiration is accruing much more slowly than in my previous (3.1.17) version. I didn't see mention of a change to that algorithm in this forum or in the release documentation.

 

Prior to installing 3.3.2 the Water Deficit Yesterday value would accumulate between .4 and .45 inches with 85-95 degrees, 20-25% humidity and 0-5 mph wind.

 

With 3.3.2 the largest value I've seen for Water Deficit Yesterday has been .12 inches with approximately the same weather conditions.

 

Actually I believe 3.3.2 is providing a more realistic evapotranspiration figure than 3.1.17 did. Before I adjust my irrigation program parameters to account for the difference in calculation I would like to be sure I am looking at things correctly.

 

mike

Posted

MIchel,

 

How do I determine what version of the irrigation module I am running? I bought it originally in January at the same time I updated from ISY 2.8.16 to 3.1.13.

 

mike

Posted

Hi Mike,

 

If you have not explicitly requested to be part of the V2 release, then you have the original one.

 

There was a bug in V1 in which case we didn't use Julian days. That might explain the fact that the readings are lower now.

 

With kind regards,

Michel

Posted

Hi Mike,

 

If you depend on your Irrigation module, I do not recommend it since it's in alpha and being tested by a couple of our customers who agreed to use their system for real-life testing. Furthermore, with V2, you are going to have even less Irrigation Requirement.

 

With kind regards,

Michel

Posted

I used to see all the current values returned from Weather Bug now the Status box is empty. Am I no longer receiving weatherbug information?

Posted

Thanks Michel, I"ll hold off.

 

On a slightly different note, are there any plans to accommodate multiple zones with different irrigation requirements in the near future?

 

mike

Posted
Great news Michel,

 

I would like to participate in testing, Alpha or Beta.

 

mike

 

Hello JMC,

 

Here is Michel's announcement from another thread:

 

 

Hello all,

 

We need a few volunteers to test the enhancements (for accuracy) as proposed by IndyMike. Please note that this will be a separate branch outside the current beta so as to not disturb existing installations. I suspect we would need about a month of testing to ensure calculations are accurate.

 

If you are interested, please send an email to support@universal-devices.com with subject "New ET Firmware".

 

Thanks in advance and with kind regards,

Michel

 

_________________

Michel Kohanim

Universal Devices, Inc.

ISY-99i/ISY-26 INSTEON Wiki

Submit a ticket

 

 

The original thread fount here. viewtopic.php?f=25&t=8771&start=0

Posted

If a program is disabled and resides within a folder would it be possible to show a disabled icon on the folder itself to indicate that one or more programs within the folder are disabled?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...