kurelgyer Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 How about an option to show the name of a device, ie. "porch Light", in event viewer, rather than the hex address? It's difficult to know what the heck is going on if you haven't memorized all the device addresses! Link to comment
Michel Kohanim Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Hi Kurelgyer, we already do have this requirement on our list but unfortunately it does not have a high priority. With kind regards, Michel Link to comment
Michel Kohanim Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Hi Kurelgyer, we already do have this requirement on our list but unfortunately it does not have a high priority. With kind regards, Michel Link to comment
johnradams Posted March 21, 2011 Share Posted March 21, 2011 Isn't this really a bug as opposed to a feature request? The event viewer is nuisance in its current form. Converting hex addresses to a human-readable equivalent is just the sort of trivial task that computers are especially good at. I suppose I should be grateful that at least you displayed the commands in hex, and thoughtfully put each packet on its own line. It would be a real hassle if the packets were just presented in one long stream, without line breaks. Link to comment
j0dan Posted April 22, 2011 Share Posted April 22, 2011 I agree. Anything to do with better logging is much needed. Having to double check the hex addresses every time I open the log is a real pain. Please consider making it a higher priority. Link to comment
Michel Kohanim Posted April 23, 2011 Share Posted April 23, 2011 johnradams, I respectfully disagree with you. j0dan, We'll do our best. With kind regards, Michel Link to comment
Illusion Posted June 17, 2011 Share Posted June 17, 2011 I would like to add my vote here as well. I just had to do a bunch of troubleshooting and having names instead of numbers in the event viewer would have made that much better. I understand the priorities, just adding my voice... Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.