andrewm Posted March 30, 2008 Posted March 30, 2008 Using a non-standard telnet port (126) does virtually nothing to improve security, instead all it does is serve to drive us mad when we can't telnet in until we remember / lookup the port the ISY uses. So why bother doing it? At least give us the option to change it back to the RFC-compliant port 23 if we want!
Michel Kohanim Posted March 31, 2008 Posted March 31, 2008 andrewm, This is planned for our next release. With kind regards, Michel Using a non-standard telnet port (126) does virtually nothing to improve security, instead all it does is serve to drive us mad when we can't telnet in until we remember / lookup the port the ISY uses. So why bother doing it? At least give us the option to change it back to the RFC-compliant port 23 if we want!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.