Jump to content

ELK M1 vs I/O linc for Garage Status


midrar

Recommended Posts

While I'm sure most of us use the Insteon I/O for garage status and control, has anyone used the Elk M1 as one for an interface. On an M1 board, output 3 is an available dry contact that could be used and I like the idea of eliminating an I/O linc for more reliability. Thanks.

Link to comment

I have my garage doors wired to the Elk.  It is of course a never-failed comm.  If you have the ability to hard wire back to the Elk panel, then I would definitely do it.  Myself, I didn't think to hard wire for control of the door (only status of the door), so I hacked an RF garage door opener and wired it directly to an Elk relay.  This works great for me since my Elk panel is easily within radio range.  I have never had a missed command in 8 years.  Much better than using Insteon comm.

Link to comment

The IOLinc has a high failure rate and exhibits unexpected behavior which can cause your garage door to randomly open or close. I use the Elk output 3 and a zone input fore status.

Interesting.

 

I have had two I/O lincs (V2.3) on my garage doors for three years, and I have never experienced hardware failures or random door opening issues. Maybe they had problems with older hardware revisions?

 

Mark

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment

I hardwired my door back to my Elk. Output three can open/close the door, and a mag switch drives the entry-2 zone (with a much longer entry timer).

The inner door to the house is entry-1 (along with the front door) with a short timer.

 

Insteon is an insecure protocol. That was my main driver to not depend on it for garage door operations. Plus, all-ons have been know to operate the iolinc, and cause the door to open...

 

Just too much risk..

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...