Michel Kohanim Posted October 10, 2007 Posted October 10, 2007 Hello All, We would like to know how important it is for us to support user defined SMTP settings. This poll is going to run for 30 days at the end of which time: If we have 60% (or more) of the vote, then we'll add User Defined SMTP Setting to our roadmap of features to be implemented. Thanks in advance for your feedback, With kind regards, Michel Quote
Mark Sanctuary Posted October 10, 2007 Posted October 10, 2007 Is this for adding simple email capabilities for notify the user of status? Quote
Michel Kohanim Posted October 10, 2007 Author Posted October 10, 2007 Hi Mark, No. This to add "advanced" capabilities so that the user can define his/her own SMTP settings. With kind regards, Michel Is this for adding simple email capabilities for notify the user of status? Quote
MikeB Posted October 10, 2007 Posted October 10, 2007 This will allow you to use your own SMTP server (in-house mail server, ISP's mail server, etc.), instead of Universal Devices to send out notifications. Quote
speacock Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 AT&T DSL blocks port outgoing port 25 meaning notifications don't appear to go out. Quote
Michel Kohanim Posted March 14, 2008 Author Posted March 14, 2008 Hello speacock, ISY does not use port 25 for notifications; it uses HTTP port 80. If your notifications are not going out, then we would have to figure out why? With kind regards, Michel AT&T DSL blocks port outgoing port 25 meaning notifications don't appear to go out. Quote
speacock Posted March 15, 2008 Posted March 15, 2008 Found it and fixed it. There are two entries for "Verizon PCS". The top one points to @vtext.com while the second one is @myvzw.com. My phone works with vtext, not myvzw. Of course now I'm waiting for custom notification strings. Just never satisfied. Sean Quote
JacquesB Posted May 30, 2009 Posted May 30, 2009 Hi, SMTP is highly restricted in many places. Also, with more and more people hidding things in port 80 just like you do, more and more deep packet inspection tools search the 80 to ensure it is proper HTTP. The only way to hide is to encrypt the socket for defeating deep packet inspection. Should you remove that feature, my setup would be powerful enough for working around it : I would intercept your SMTP over port 80 to the specific address you would use and just re-forward it to my own SMTP server. I could even use STUNNEL if you decide to encrypt your faked socket. Here is my complete mail service at home : 1-I fetch from my provider 2-I clean the mail (antispam - antivirus - antiphishin) 3-I save it on an IMAP server 4-RIM (BlackBerry) fetches it from my IMAP over SSL and send it to my BlackBerry 5-When I send a mail from my Black, a copy is saved on the IMAP server The controller send my e-mail directly to the IMAP server, just like I would be capable of sending mail to it without having these mails over Internet by connecting my servers with SSH from my Black. Jacques Quote
Michel Kohanim Posted May 31, 2009 Author Posted May 31, 2009 Hi Jacques, Apologies ... I think you may be looking at very old posts. In our latest releases, you can configure your own SMTP settings including TLS support (tested on gmail only). With kind regards, Michel Hi, SMTP is highly restricted in many places. Also, with more and more people hidding things in port 80 just like you do, more and more deep packet inspection tools search the 80 to ensure it is proper HTTP. The only way to hide is to encrypt the socket for defeating deep packet inspection. Should you remove that feature, my setup would be powerful enough for working around it : I would intercept your SMTP over port 80 to the specific address you would use and just re-forward it to my own SMTP server. I could even use STUNNEL if you decide to encrypt your faked socket. Here is my complete mail service at home : 1-I fetch from my provider 2-I clean the mail (antispam - antivirus - antiphishin) 3-I save it on an IMAP server 4-RIM (BlackBerry) fetches it from my IMAP over SSL and send it to my BlackBerry 5-When I send a mail from my Black, a copy is saved on the IMAP server The controller send my e-mail directly to the IMAP server, just like I would be capable of sending mail to it without having these mails over Internet by connecting my servers with SSH from my Black. Jacques Quote
JacquesB Posted May 31, 2009 Posted May 31, 2009 Right! I missed the year The poll is still open and at the top list of the forum. May be should it be removed ? Jacques Quote
Michel Kohanim Posted May 31, 2009 Author Posted May 31, 2009 Yes, you are right ... we should remove this poll. Sorry for the confusion. With kind regards, Michel Right! I missed the year The poll is still open and at the top list of the forum. May be should it be removed ? Jacques Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.