October 21, 20196 yr Happy it works, sadly it still falls short of the support needed for most. Most users are not going to want to alter parameters (especially if parameters are different based on version). Thanks for the time and effort.
October 22, 20196 yr Author 3 hours ago, LaymansPC said: Happy it works, sadly it still falls short of the support needed for most. Most users are not going to want to alter parameters (especially if parameters are different based on version). Thanks for the time and effort. That's zwave in general. Gotta get on mfg. in how they set programming
October 22, 20196 yr 5 hours ago, LaymansPC said: Happy it works, sadly it still falls short of the support needed for most. Most users are not going to want to alter parameters (especially if parameters are different based on version). Thanks for the time and effort. As mentioned above - this is the decision of the device vendor - not the hub vendor. If you are concerned about users altering parameters - it sounds to me as if you should consider not using zwave - as this is a common issue with this standard. Each vendor does their own thing - and sometimes changes between versions. You really need to keep a cache of documentation for devices you have. If you were to stick with Insteon you'd only have Smarthomes drifting standards to contend with...
October 23, 20196 yr Hello everyone, thanks so very much for all the feedback, help, and suggestions. I am hopeful that 3 pages of explanations will prove useful to others who are already aware of their own expectations. In the end, what's a forum without armchair-keyboard-usability-experts who talk on behalf of "most users"? With kind regards, Michel
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.