Sub-Routine Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 You aren't unzipping it, are you? Point the ISY at the zip file and the ISY will uncrunch it. Rand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 10, 2008 Share Posted April 10, 2008 Correct, Pointing at the zip file. I was just checking that the zip file wasnt corrupted, etc. -Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kohanim Posted April 11, 2008 Author Share Posted April 11, 2008 Hi Matt, This is getting to be very strange. There are usually only two causes for this issue: 1. Corrupt/incompatible file 2. Firewall May I humbly ask what firewall software you have? With kind regards, Michel Correct, Pointing at the zip file. I was just checking that the zip file wasnt corrupted, etc. -Matt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthemAVM Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 I was wondering if anyone got 2.6.3 to work on the AT&T Blackberry 8810? Thanks Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnthemAVM Posted April 19, 2008 Share Posted April 19, 2008 I have been working with 2.6.3 for a few weeks, has been very stable. I can get to it from our Iphone, but the blackberry isn't working. I get the message about the SSL, then I say Yes, then the Blackberry comes back and tells me the internet can not connect. Any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kohanim Posted April 22, 2008 Author Share Posted April 22, 2008 Hello AnthemAVM, These should be solved in 2.6.4 and they have to do with the timeout value for the HTTP/HTTPS request which will be configurable in 2.6.4. With kind regards, Michel I have been working with 2.6.3 for a few weeks, has been very stable. I can get to it from our Iphone, but the blackberry isn't working. I get the message about the SSL, then I say Yes, then the Blackberry comes back and tells me the internet can not connect. Any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kohanim Posted April 23, 2008 Author Share Posted April 23, 2008 Subscribe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dss Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Digger, I cannot say it's a bug since we do not yet have the memory map to ascertain whether or not this is a bug! With kind regards, Michel Hello dss, KPL 1.4 issue is a bug which was introduced in 2.6.3. KPL Relay is an open question to SmartLabs for which we do not yet have answer. With kind regards, Michel I can't seem to be able to get the secondary buttons on a v1.0 Keypadlinc relay and v1.4 Keypadlinc dimmer into non-toggle mode. It says it is changed in the ISY interface but when I try to use the KP it is still in toggle mode. Is this a bug in the Keypadlinc relay? If so I might as well return mine before I put them in. Has this problem been solved? Or is it in the firmware and cannot be solved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michel Kohanim Posted September 7, 2008 Author Share Posted September 7, 2008 Hello dss, Unfortunately we have not heard anything back from SmartHome/Labs ... I am so terribly sorry. With kind regards, Michel Digger, I cannot say it's a bug since we do not yet have the memory map to ascertain whether or not this is a bug! With kind regards, Michel Hello dss, KPL 1.4 issue is a bug which was introduced in 2.6.3. KPL Relay is an open question to SmartLabs for which we do not yet have answer. With kind regards, Michel I can't seem to be able to get the secondary buttons on a v1.0 Keypadlinc relay and v1.4 Keypadlinc dimmer into non-toggle mode. It says it is changed in the ISY interface but when I try to use the KP it is still in toggle mode. Is this a bug in the Keypadlinc relay? If so I might as well return mine before I put them in. Has this problem been solved? Or is it in the firmware and cannot be solved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.