Xathros

I suspect that a Delete PLM was issued from the menu at some point. -Xathros

You issue adjust scene statements to however many devices in the scene you want to change then issue a scene On command or issue direct ON commands the the member devices with whatever brightness you desire. -Xathros

Do you have an recent ISY backup from before the PLM failure? If so, I would restore the backup then run the Restore PLM again. -Xathros

UDI currently has their first batch of 5 test PLM's ready but I believe they are waiting for a resolution to the pesky All On events before going into full scale production. -Xathros

Additionally, make sure the address is correct. 8 and B are often mistaken for each other. -Xathros

Always happy to help. -Xathros Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bfish- You will need both the hardware and the software module. I don't believe the order of installation matters but the module is useless without the hardware installed. Have you ordered the software module from the menu within the admin console yet? -Xathros Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Your original link ended with "%C2%A0" Once removed, the URL is fine. If you look at the original link, you will see the underline extend beyond ...cgi-api/ -Xathros

Swap the cable between Port A on the ISY and the PLM with a known good cable. Power down the ISY, reboot the PLM, wait 10 seconds then power up the ISY. -Xathros

Mobilinc does a good job of bringing the ISY to the mobile device and with the support of IP cams, it makes a nice solution for remote control and viewing. -Xathros

There are no "Insteon" cameras. SH sells a re-branded Foscam camera that they call Insteon but only because their Smartphone App supports the camera stream. The cam itself does not speak Insteon. A number of us interact with PTZ cams using ISY network resources to do things like point the cam to a particular location or enable/disable recording etc. Others are using Synology NAS boxes to capture/record video from IP cams and then interact with the Synology via the ISY. I believe with the latter, you can have a cam cause an action on the ISY though this may require a third machine in the middle. In some cases, with a middleman server like an RaspberryPi, you can have a Foscan cam trigger an action on the ISY as well but I have heard conflicting reports depending on the cam's firmware level. Mobilinc has support for a wide range of IP cams and this brings the appearance of integration with the HA system. Hope this helps. -Xathros

Anytime! Happy to help. -Xathros

You can right click on any of your programs and select Find/Replace, use that to search for your Raw text, variable, device, scene or program name. For scene membership, simply select the device in the tree and look at the right side of the screen to any scenes that it controls or responds to. -Xathros

No, nor in my router. So far this has not happened again. I just turned debug back on (after yesterdays update) and am awaiting another occurrence. -Xathros

Right click on any one of your programs or folders, select Status Icons and Detailed. Test again. -Xathros

Thanks Michel- I've had UPnP bombardment from my DirecTV receivers in the past. I have debug on and am waiting for it to happen again. I will let you know what I see on the next occurrence. -Xathros

And why I responded that they were just -101 -Xathros Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, there is a web interface for control but not for configuration and programming. -Xathros Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Stu- I'm 'm quite familiar with that list. You will notice that it does not list -101 -Xathros Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Michel- I will turn on debugging and watch the logs. Nothing new on my network. The errors were exactly as I posted, -101. My ISY does make extensive use of my network so this could be related to something I have done. I will post back when I know more. Thanks. -Xathros Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can anyone tell me what these errors are: Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http Wed 2015/01/28 06:09:19 PM System -101 http My ISY has locked up 3 times in the last 3 weeks. Each time the lockup was preceeded by thousands of these entries withing a 3-5 minute period. -Xathros

The instead would be the True/False status of a program. Useful mostly for boolean functions. My preference would be a variable instead of a program but there have been a few cases where using the state of a program seemed more elegant to me. For instance, if you have a program that sets a variable to 1 in the then and 0 in the else, the true/false status of the program is identical to the variable and unless your doing math with the variable's value, makes it just extra and unnecessary. For me a variable seems more flexible. It has a current and init value, can do math, has more than 2 possible values and if named well can actually help document a program. Mostly though, it's a matter of preference. -Xathros

In my experience, it's the salesmen that promise the world and me as the technician that has to deliver and make it work. Just sayin... -Xathros

As long as 5.X breaks the date into separate month/day/year fields, then I think we have what we need to do calendaring - just not pretty. -Xathros