
Panda88
Members-
Posts
767 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Panda88
-
Minor cosmetic issue for Yolink motion detector device
Panda88 replied to dwengrovitz's topic in YoLink
will do thanks Christian -
Yolink should work well for that
-
List is up to date. I did not get a thermostat yet, but It should not be too much effort to add it If you are willing to work with me (or let me access it for a little while) I can try to add it
-
Is there a log for the PG3 it self you can provide. There may be an issue with installing on of the python libraries. I am travelling and am not back until the new year so it's difficult to debug - especially without a log being generated
-
Thanks - unfortunately PG3 uses pip for install - I may be able to use pkg as part of the install script - need to experiment a little
-
I did update the requirement.txt to force the version I use - Can you try to delete and reinstall ?
-
If you are talking sub nodes of a multi-output device (e.g. numbers outlets or USB outputs) - then yes - this release renamed those nodes - I found a case where 2 nodes would get the same name with the old names (It was a bug in the first place) - I do not expect other devices not to show, unless yolink do not report them It was mentioned in the release note
-
Possible - I am trying to get a new Test_TESLA_EV released
-
Maybe I can try to rename it
-
Thanks - I will be travelling so out of reach for a little while - Not too urgent to check it out - just wanted to get the latest changes in - It seems Tesla changed how they report sleep and this addresses this and some other fixes
-
Is there any chance I can get you to try the release in non-production store - There are some fixes there I want to release it but do not have a good way to test
-
I can try to force the original version I was using in the requirements @Michel Kohanim - Can I get you to try to build version 5.9.2 I do not feel like trying to edit this package
-
0.2.18 hopefully fixes it - there was one more conversion bug in the code
-
yes - looks like a build error - I was on 5.4.4 when building it and used release 5.9.2 @Michel Kohanim - Any input as to why psutil will fail build on 5.4.5?
-
I believe I fixed it already - it was one of my first python projects and I have no way to test the control code, as I do not have a car to test it on
-
0.7.2 - I see it inthe production store - maybe try to refresh the store
-
Found a bug - 0.2.16 I have been working on furhter improvements but not released yet
-
Do you have a more complete debug log (enable debug) - It is very difficult for me to debug this as I do not own a Tesla. I'll take a look tomorrow
-
Ignore above - I had a mistake in the release procedure - try 0.7.2
-
Can you send log? - I removed code to remove nodes?
-
I somehow got it to connect - not sure what happened - maybe the Envisalink people did somehting remotely
-
I released 0.7.1 I am no longer trying to remove older nodes - Main issue will be with multi Output devices - the naming changed to prevent multiple nodes with same name (when using multiple multiOutput of same type) Hopefully this works now
-
I see an error - I'll take a look tomorrow - I think there is a bug when the addresses are too close The removal of nodes was only supposed to remove the sub nodes of multi-devices - I had a bug in the old node
-
I wonder if my router/firewall updated FW and somehow blocked the port (on the LAN side) - I did submit a question there as well