lilyoyo1

You dont say what your locks are nor what your firmware and UI is so there is limited support we can give you. See Zwave tips and tricks (very first post on this sub-forum) as that could provide you information that could help you with your issues. Just because you have devices 5' from your lock does not mean they are routing your messages to your locks. You can check to see what the neighbors are by right-clicking on the device, then Z-Wave> Show Information In the Event Viewer, then watch to see the nearest neighbor. There is no way to just see zwave devices (especially if you renamed them completely). Generally, they start with ZW (and their number). It is not possible to view what the codes are. There is a notes section that you can put your codes in if you right click on the device.

You have to click the button once you change the settings

Past tense or potential option? Was it part of the insteon sale?

It wasn't half baked. The product works really well with it's hub/app (until servers went down) and still continue to do so locally. Much better from a quality and functional standpoint from the insteon line

Not really. The nokia line was ready for release

That's built into ZigBee. Hue bulbs do the same by assigning a separate address for groups/scenes

Direct association is direct communication between linked devices. There are no hops or communication over the network except for status being sent to the controller. You're referring to assigned association which is different

Homeseer allows you to set direct association between compatible devices which does away with the popcorn effect. However that's extremely limited compared to insteon in multiple ways. You're right about the big names failing. Most of what they release fails. We just remember the success stories because of their impact.

It's all exactly the same except for the difference in capabilities with the protocols.

There's no difference. The same information applies. There isn't a device specific place to turn to as the same device can be different based on your Isy firmware along with device specific firmware. Generally, if you want to know what node does what, you'll need to play around with it to see how each responds. Some may require parameters to be set in order to work. The full online manual for your specific device would be able to provide that information.

Unfortunately they've never made clear the stuff you've asked (as far as I've seen). I'm sure there will be some command specific things for consistency sake (such as on/off/dim/brighten). My guess, it'll be similar to what we have now in regards to using voice assistants to control devices.

When it comes to current diy "protocols", there's insteon (whenever they start releasing new devices), zwave, ZigBee, Lutron clear connect, wifi, and Bluetooth. All with their own pros and cons. What will exist in the future, we do not know. Only wifi does not require a physical bridge in order to work. (Technically insteon doesn't but you wouldn't have timers or remote operation). Instead, it requires an app on your phone to set up and configure. Each device/mfg. can still use their own chosen protocol (insteon, ZigBee, zwave, clear connect) since those with hubs will still be connected to your network as well. Wifi devices would still be connected independently to your wifi network as is now. However, if it's a Matter connected device, thread would be able to connect it and other devices on your network under a common language. I've linked an article that explains things better than I can. In short, wifi will be there and used. Thread is just an additional.layer tying things together

You probably should put your beer down so you can come up with coherent sentences and/or remember what you typed a few hours ago. The first letter you type was I. Second line started with "my assumption" 3rd paragraph once again started with "I have never had" 4th paragraph- "I have never seen that"- though you did leave a slight opening for MDUs. Next to last paragraph- "and my favorite" Last paragraph- "I assume" So yes, with the amount of I's and me's being dropped in your explanation, please forgive me for thinking you were referring to your own bubble. I guess you only read my post just to argue back which is fine. Maybe you should learn to read for comprehension. Had you done so, you would have seen that I wasn't disagreeing with you but instead pointing out that the problem with different wifi setups and tools is assuming most people have the knowledge about them in addition to the skill set to use them properly. Guess what- Most do not. What you prefer and another uses are 2 different things. A person with knowledge, desire, and skills can use anything that's available to accomplish any given task. Someone else will probably take a simpler approach whether it's a good solution or not. The world is full of the latter. Just because you've read something and only have dealt with it in your personal life does not make you an expert. I've been doing homes for years and still learn new stuff unlike you who think they know it all. Ive never had a use for tools to troubleshoot insteon. I took the time to learn how it works through actual use and not just in my home. I experimented in family and friends houses. Putting stuff in/out and using different combinations. Ditto with C4, zwave, and now Lutron. Up until i stopped installing it, I made sure i installed it in such a way to give me a positive outcome. I still do with other systems as well. I have no issue in having discussions about assumptions. However, I don't lose sight about what it in front of us now instead of believing some magical pipe dream of what i wish something could be. My home network is strong enough where i could run everything on wifi but i don't. Anything that can be hardwired is still hardwired. People not wanting to use a bunch of wifi devices in their home (or others) is their perogative. If you like wifi devices and have no issues so be it. Others may not want to take the time and expense of filling their home with them only to create new issues that they didn't have before with other stuff. At least with insteon, zwave, or any other mesh type system, issues with those do not affect anything else in the house that others may need (for the most part).

JJust so you know. This method you're choosing is no longer being developed so support for the Node server you're looking at may be limited in addition to his long it'll actually work

I doubt it since its a pull chain. It's still engaged as if a dummy switch controlled it.

You don't have to be in either of those places but it was just an example that many in the US lives in areas where you can find hundreds of people in a small area. I've had neighbors ask for help with their own issues (all were using cable provided routers). A few added a couple of ring cameras only to watch their network performance take a hit

The thing about looking at your singular experience is that it assumes that millions of others are in your position. In my neighborhood, our houses are far enough away that no one interferes with each other. Go uptown and do a wifi scan, you'll run out of room on your wifi list (not literally). High density cities such as NYC and LA can run into wifi issues and people often do. It also doesn't take into account that most do not have enough networking experience or knowledge of tools that can help troubleshoot. In addition most still use the cable company provided routers. If they add repeaters, it'll be the generic mesh systems that you knock... We all still make alot of assumptions about a something that does not yet exist. It's easy for us to say so they need to do is XYZ. However, if it were, it would've already been done.

I think they chose wifi for it's pros (it's everywhere, no hub required, a variable they can control) not necessarily because it's the best or without issue

If you noticed, I said I don't see where they changed their focus to commercial not from. Besides, a few commercial ventures does not mean that's where their focus is/was. For example, I've done a couple of commercial projects but my focus is on residential new construction. One thing that stands out is that they've only highlighted a few large installations like that. That's because there aren't many more. Some of the works they showcased as theirs was piggy backed off of Steve Lee's work (independent of them). Regardless of the home size, it was installers choosing to use insteon in homes not insteon pursuing those homes. They developed the product as a low cost alternative for hobbyists and enthusiasts. Installers saw the benefits of it and used it. Their first move into mass appeal was actually the smartlinc. It was a way to gain acceptance by users who did not have the technical skills to use one of their PLC controllers or did not want to leave their computer on 24/7 with houslinc. Houslinc was always going to be disco'd after the first hub. While the hub could be used as a PLM, it was determined then that houslinc had reached EOL (around the same time it became free to use). The idea behind hub 2 was to go mainstream. This is when they started creating retail packages and working to sell in regular stores, When they came out with hub2, they disco'd houselinc completely but maintained it in regards to new firmware compatibility due to user backlash. Subsequently this is when they started on their Asics chip..The plan was for that and to create an "Isy killer" software (which employees laughed about), for hub 3. The store went from what it was to an Apple inspired theme. Then came home kit and the slide began/picked up steam. All future plans were dropped and the focus went to homekit.

I'm not really seeing where they changed their focus to a smart commercial building market (that's locked down by much higher quality systems). If anything, they focused more on mass/casual users than anything. This shows with their stabs at retail (and retail packaging), along with jumping aboard homekit from day 1 (which really jumpstarted their downfall).

They did with the Isy launcher.

I agree with you on all of your points. They have a rough road ahead of them. As much of a supporter of insteon that I am, they would have to show me that they are a completely different company than they were and not just lipstick on a pig. Other installers I know feel the same way. This is why im strongly against re-releasing the same old product line. This is a perfect time for a fresh start and clean slate. Sure, they'll upset some people since the devices would look different but it allows them to cut themselves off from the old history and poor quality issues that they cant seem to shake regardless of the truth. Existing base isnt enough to carry the company. Looking at the amount of old systems that have changed hands over the last few months on ebay, many of them are already gone and many of the rest probably have enough parts to be ok for a while. If a person wants a basic home control system or control over a few devices, there are simpler low cost options out there and they probably wouldnt have turned to insteon anyway. For those who wants Automation, those devices will not suffice and zwave has its own complexities which makes it even less attractive. For those looking for HA and not HC, insteon is perfect price wise and in simplicity which can allow it to have a place in the world. They may not be world conquering, but they can have enough market share to stay alive and flourish if they make smart decisions. I do think they should go back to focusing on the market that made them in the first place and become a niche company. With Polisy, HA, Homeseer, (Potentially) Matter, etc., they do not have to try and create products for every facet of someone's home. Just a core group of products that most people use and let others fill in the rest.

This i agree with. Matter is a must for them to even have a chance

The point that i was making about the screwless wall plate is how they match extremely well with the new devices vs older stuff. Its the small attention to detail which the old units lack such as exact color match and how they fit inside the wallplate themselves. Those minor details allow them to stand out even more. It's similar to lutron's devices and their Wallplates. The fit, finish, and consistency allows their devices to stand out just a little bit more. Some people are happy with things being good enough. However, as others step up and put more thought into their designs, insteon needs to do and be better- especially after their shutdown fiasco. They simply have more to prove at this point in order to win back old customers, gain new ones, and increase interest in 3 party licensing deals. They can have the best protocol in the world but that means nothing if they don't have product that people want to buy. Getting other companies on board will be harder as well. What do they have to offer that zwave, ZigBee, or wifi doesn't to make someone pay yet another licensing fee to use them? It's always been easy to license X10 but how many do so? Insteon could fall into the same boat. It's not like those same companies were knocking down the door to buy them. It's easy to say all that they have to do is XYZ. Reality is much different. They'll have to get companies to buy into them. The best way to do so is have a successful product line that people want to buy. Keeping the old line will allow them to sell a bunch of product early on as existing users snatch up spares but that does not guarantee long term success for their own sales or for others who may see them as the same old company. What is overlooked in all of this licensing talk is that Insteon will always be the sole source in dinner manner even with licensing deals since they'll be selling the chips and developing the firmware for the hardware themselves. For years, Sigma/silicon labs was the sole provider of zwave chips. It's telling that they opened up semi-conductor manufacturing to others in 2020 and yet you still see others buying from them because it's easier, quicker, and cheaper that way. No different than corporations selling franchises. It's yours but they still maintain control through various means and methods. Insteon will want to do the same. This means control over the firmware, code, or chip itself hence sole source in some manner. Because of this, before investing in product design, integration, distribution, etc. interested parties will wait to see if insteon will be viable long term. Ditto for installers. Those burned over the last year(especially with closure) will not rush to jump back on that band wagon. The message that a new line sends is much greater than the old.

Its not puzzling. If you yell at someone across a room and they hear you, does that guarantee you'll hear them? Same applies for your devices. That's why repeaters are recommended