Michel Kohanim

Hi Tim, Yes, 08/31/2013. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Sackings, Please send to support@universal-devices.com. With kind regards, Michel

Hi tech_dog, They should be supported: viewtopic.php?f=25&t=10770 With kind regards, Michel

Hello everyone, Just an update: Weatherbug is moving all their APIs and servers to Earth Networks and thus we might have to go through another set of beta testing just for the new services. Hopefully the new services are more reliable since, now, their services are based on SLAs based on Transactions per second. With kind regards, Michel

Hello backinthelab, My pleasure ... we do not at all subscribe to "big data" and analytics. With kind regards, Michel

Hi David, It would be best if you sent an email to support@universal-devices.com. Something is not right: at the minimum, you should see a list of PANs of which yours is one. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Michael, yes possible. Just got an email from WeatherBug (now Earth Networks). They are changing all their servers/APIs and making them more SLA/transaction based oriented. Hopefully we'll come out of this one unscathed! With kind regards, Michel

Hi David, Did you follow all the instructions? Do you see the PAN ID? What is the length of the install code you used? With kind regards, Michel

Hi billchurch, Please do make sure you do NOT have any other versions of Java (especially 1.6) concurrently installed. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Sackings, I have not received anything at all. To which email did you send? With kind regards, Michel

Hi paauto, No, it should be your actual dynamic dns domain. The state/locality/email/etc. do not really cause certificate errors. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Tim, Please note that if either the subject or body is empty then notification will not be sent. With kind regards, Michel

Hi paauto, The hostname = common name and in your case: XXX.dnsalias.org With kind regards, Michel

Hi Barry, Not a bug. With kind regards, Michel

Hi paauto, The domain name (or IP address) for ISY must be identical to the common name that you have used for the certificate. If not, then regardless of what you do with the trust center in your computer, you will get that warning. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Michael, The latter would make much more sense since the former was discussed and we were still liable for $$$ licensing fees and making sure the polling intervals are not less than 5 minutes, etc. etc. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Michael, This is precisely why every time we try to add anonymous, it immediately becomes a huge requirement to revamp authorization in ISY. Adding a simply boolean at /USER/WEB is easy. Adding a password file for each directory requires investigation of what we ultimately want to do. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Elburn, That's why the first requirement was: a. Both ISYs should be on the same network You have two choices: 1. You can run RJ45 wire from your router in 1 to a switch in 2 2. You can use WiFi access points in bridge mode. This means that your access point in 2 MUST BE able to see your router in 1 With kind regards, Michel

Hi btWix, Got it. This is much easier ... thank you. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Alan, You could do that with PRO series. This said, this will make ISY not accessible to any device that can do https BUT not client authentication. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Elburn and Alan, Yes, that's what I mean: ISY1->Network Resource->REST->ISY2 ISY2->Network Resource->REST->ISY1 With kind regards, Michel

Sorry: With kind regards, Michel

Hi Michael, Fortunately/Unfortunately, we (as in UDI) cannot do anything with WUnderground as they wanted to charge us 10s of thousands of dollars just to become a partner. It will be up to you and other 3rd parties to actually get the data to ISY. Yes, you can anything that can communicate events and get commands from ISY. With kind regards, Michel

Hi bTwix, Thanks so very much for the suggestion and feedback. This has been on our requirement list for a VERY long time. The reason is that every time we try to implement it, we face much deeper security challenges. As far as the wife factor, most http clients support Basic Authentication. Is it difficult to hardcode ISY's userid/password in your client? i.e. I am just delegating the security hole back to your client With kind regards, Michel

Hello backinthelab, Not only I very much understand your sentiments but also I do agree. You can remove the scene. Please note that ISY does NOT in any shape or form communicate with any other entity outside of your home WITHOUT your explicit permission/intervention. Actually, this is the one feature that we are promoting all over the place: Autonomous --> no data going out and no commands coming in. You ARE in control. With kind regards, Michel