Michel Kohanim

Hi matapan, do you know the IP address of your ISY? With kind regards, Michel

Hi fitzpatri8, Thanks so very much. This is quite odd since based on the developers notes: Micro Module Relay: (915 MHz: 2443-222 - Dev 0x02 / Sub 0x2F) (869 MHz: 2443-422 - Dev 0x02 / Sub 0x31) (921 MHz: 2443-522 - Dev 0x02 / Sub 0x32) Whereas what the device is reporting is 14 (0x0E) which is category for Window Covering. Can you please let me know how you are adding it? With kind regards, Michel

Hi Guys, Thanks so very much for the feedback. Step by step instructions shall be available shortly. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Mike, What are the values for Absorption Factor/Soil Type and Water Applied Per Irrigation Cycle? With kind regards, Michel

Hello everyone, Actually for the last 5 batches, we decreased the brightness a little. Unfortunately we cannot dim it more without a HW design change and, at the moment, we do not have any such plans. With kind regards, Michel

Hello fitzpatri8, Micro Module is supported. Can you tell me which model number you are trying to add? With kind regards, Michel

Hello jblackst5000, Apologies for tardy reply. Unfortunately we do not yet have alerts/forecasts implemented both of which are in the list of our requirements. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Guys, Xathros/Gary are 100% correct. You can subscribe to ISY. With kind regards, Michel

Hello hart2hart, Is this random or does it happen all the time? With kind regards, Michel

Hello az1324, Thank you. We'll revisit through the documentation, consult with SmartHome, and will get back to you. As of now, I have categorized this as bug ID#78. With kind regards, Michel

Hi gamard, The reason is historical: you can only launch one Admin Console per Finder. As such, after you launch the first one, there's really no reason for it to be active. You can simply close it. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Scott MS, Yes, we will be adding those in the future (REQID#55). With kind regards, Michel

Hi Gary, The answer is no. With kind regards, Michel

az1324, With all due respect, I strongly disagree with you but I am not going to try and persuade you one way or another. I will post back as soon as I hear back from SmartHome. With kind regards, Michel

Hi dpark, Yes it is. With kind regards, Michel

Hi az1324, All 7 are supported in the new firmware version. This said, just because two devices exhibit this behavior does not make a compelling case for implementing something ESPECIALLY since 99.9% of other INSTEON devices do NOT (regardless of whatever they "assume" the linking method is). In short, without verification from SmartHome, this is VERY risky for us and not something I would like to entertain without more empirical data from more devices and their characteristics. As such, and at the moment, the only think I can do is to send a link to this post to our contacts at SmartHome. Whatever is their recommendation shall be done. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Xathros, Thanks so very much for the details. Yes, most failures that I have seen are on Windows. I suspect something in the networking subsystem but I am not entirely sure yet. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Phil, Sincere apologies for tardy reply. Please do be kind enough to contact our tech support and we'll walk through possible causes. With kind regards, Michel

Hi hagak, unfortunately not to both questions. With kind regards, Michel

Traditore, Would you please send an email to tech@universal-devices.com? I'll send you a URL to an ISY in the lab and, if you don'd mind, please create the content and we'll test. I really cannot reproduce this problem no matter what I tried. With kind regards, Michel

az1324, As I mentioned before, we cannot implement anything that's NOT in the developers guide. What's in ISY is precisely what should be there based on the documentation (or will be). With kind regards, Michel

Hi Phil, Please go to Help | About and make sure you have the correct UI level matching your firmware OR clear your Java cache and retry. With kind regards, Michel

Hi Barry, The main difference is that we removed UPnP subscriptions from 4.0.x branch. And, that's where things are failing. With kind regards, Michel

Hello Traditore, bsobel is right on. Can you please let me know which SMTP server you are using? And, would it be possible to use either gmail or default just to test differences if any? With kind regards, Michel

Hi rpsa, LeeG is 100% correct. Please remove the bridge, upgrade to 4.0.2, link it back. With kind regards, Michel