Michel Kohanim

Depends on the changes but potentially yes plus testing, regression testing, and FCC. With kind regards, Michel

@upstatemike, I think it's more of a piecemeal thing where some bid for patents, some for inventory, some for customer list, etc. I am not privy to the actual bids by others though. Also, at the moment, there are at least 5 parts that cannot be sourced (lead time of 30 weeks). I have asked our own CM to review the design and see whether or not it's possible to use alternatives (requires redesign). I shall keep you all posted. With kind regards, Michel

@TJF1960, Nooooooo ... not yet! udx depends on that monster of mongo. We are very close in getting rid of PG2. With kind regards, Michel

Hello all, Apologies for being MIA ... just too many things going on all at the same time. We already submitted an offer just for the PLM license till we further analyze the debt to potential ratio by going through AP/AR and assets. And, in the meantime, the manufacturer in China is already sourcing parts ... so, we'll be ready to go as soon as we get the license. With kind regards, Michel

Thank you all. As I had anticipated, the demand is just not there! With kind regards, Michel

@Dogan Bora, The problem with Status is that the program will not get re-evaluated if the status has not changed. So, based on the event viewer, the switch was already off. Why don't you turn it on and then off and retry. With kind regards, Michel

@Wes Westhaver, Those are files that describe notes for nodes. If you are using MobiLinc Connect, that's probably the cause because it queries all the notes for nodes. But, if there are no notes, you see that line in the error log. It's completely benign. With kind regards, Michel

Hello everyone, we'll take a look. With kind regards, Michel

@kzboray, That's a brilliant idea and definitely something to support for sure x 1000%. This said, currently the host is literally the host (IP or hostname). The path is added to the host by PG3. With kind regards, Michel

@asbril, Need the error log. With kind regards, Michel

Just in case anyone is interested, the PLM manufacturer we are working with, has the following: 700 IOLincs 1000 SwitchLinc Relays I told him that I would ask the community whether or not anyone is interested and let him know. Costwise, though, when you add shipping and customs, they will be around $50 to $55 each. Also, there's no warranty of any sort. With kind regards, Michel

@arshishk, What is Master Switch D? If a KPL button, you cannot turn it on/off. You have to put it in a scene and turn on/off the scene. And, then wait for All On and All Off bug to hit you. With kind regards, Michel

@whywork, thank you so very much. At this juncture, we have a couple and active private equity investors who are interested in the same. Just going through the numbers right now. I shall definitely keep everyone posted. Thanks again so much. With kind regards, Michel

@arshishk, Is this a KPL button? With kind regards, Michel

@fmk2, You need to remove them from ISY: Admin Console | Node Servers | Configure| Hubitat ... Delete. With kind regards, Michel

Hello everyone, First of all, I am so very honored and, frankly, this is the greatest career achievement I could have ever imagined for anyone let alone for myself. So, THANK YOU. From my perspective, things that are worth it: 1. Hub customers ... but I think 100K is exaggerated 2. PLM 3. INSTEON IP if and only if it's relatively inexpensive. The reason is that, for the technology to be viable, a) it has to be secure and b) it has to be extensible (not just for switches/sensors and simple thing for which the market is way too saturated). So, the tech will need to be extended since the current 24 bytes are not sufficient for any type of security or extensibility. If the tech can support longer packet sizes (even if fragmented), then the sky is the limit since we can have node servers on devices, and thus the same protocol can be used for pretty much anything in the world. Therefore, an opportunity to license it to everyone and for anything We are still going through all the numbers and their documentation. I will keep you all posted. Thanks again so much for your vote of confidence. With kind regards, Michel

Working on it. With kind regards, Michel

Thank you @lilyoyo1. We have also contacted the original PLM manufacturer and trying to see whether or not he has some stock. If interested, please create an account or login to an existing one, uncheck everything except for Product News & Announcements, and once we have confirmation, we'll notify you. With kind regards, Michel

@Techman, yes ... With kind regards, Michel

@mmb, Hub does not have bidirectional communications through TCP. So, it will require major development to get it to work. In the meantime, one of our very good friends provided us with the contact info for INSTEON manufacturing in China. They might still have some PLMs so we'll try to get as many as we can (and pray that they won't die). We shall keep you posted. With kind regards, Michel

@lilyoyo1, thank you. So, you still have the delays even with 2413S? With kind regards, Michel

Thank you all for your feedback. We are trying to reproduce ... @arshishk, did the event viewer show DON or did you get DON after 20 seconds? @vbphil, are these variables incremented based on INSTEON events Do all of you have 2413U? With kind regards, Michel

@arshishk, What exactly is Family Flood.1? @lilyoyo1, Please post programs that are intermittently slow. For those with these issues, there has been a major change but only for network resources: now, network resources and node servers are not queued. This means that if you have programs sending network commands, and with default connect time out of 10 seconds, there might be delays. Thus my question about Flood.1. With kind regards, Michel

@rskirch, Please try: https://wiki.universal-devices.com/index.php?title=Main_Page#Admin_Console_is_very_slow_or_hangs With kind regards, Michel

What I know is that they were going to sell but it didn't go through, so they just decided to shut down. With regard to PLM and devices, the outlook is grim. If they would offer me their PLM code/chip in return for $ per unit, I might consider (all we need is the chip since we already designed it once before they shut us down). I will not entertain up front $. The only goal would be to support existing customers. With kind regards, Michel